Jump-Starting
Your Law Firm's Diversity Program
By Mauricio
Velásquez, MBA
At a recent firm retreat it is
evident to everyone that there is a real conspicuous absence of visible
diversity among your partners. There seems to be consensus of a shared concern
among the partners but no one comes forward to take the bull by the horns. This
could be called a moment of truth or an “internal driver” or motivator. Your
company could also be dealing with the marketplace realities where some of your
clients are beginning to point out that they don’t see representative talent
from all walks of life in your firm’s attorney ranks and it is beginning to
concern them and their stakeholders. This is what I could call an “external
driver.”
| Understanding
the Differences Between EEO/AA and Diversity
Major
differences between EEO/AA and diversity are:
| ► |
EEO/AA is government-initiated while diversity is voluntary and
company-driven.
|
| ► |
EEO/AA is legally-driven while diversity is productivity-driven.
|
| ► |
EEO/AA is quantitative and diversity is qualitative. |
| ► |
EEO/AA is problem-focused, whereas diversity focuses on
opportunities. |
| ► |
EEO/AA assumes assimilation among its participants, but diversity
assumes integration. |
| ► |
EEO/AA has a strictly internal focus, while diversity focuses on
internal and external issues. |
| ► |
EEO/AA is reactive, but diversity is proactive. |
|
For years, you, your colleagues
and your firm leadership has noticed this developing reality but the firm hasn’t
seemed able to “move the diversity needle.” What are you lacking? A formal
diversity strategy and plan, the backbone of any diversity program, is typically
the first the place a diversity consultant looks upon consulting with law firms
regarding their emerging internal and external diversity issues.
The success of a diversity
program is measured through several factors, such as the nurturing of an
inclusive workplace culture, growth in the hiring, retention, and promotion of
women and minorities and the increase in business with clients that explicitly
value and reward diversity.
But sometimes growth can
stagnate, momentum can stall, and programs that were once received with great
enthusiasm disappear. What’s the solution? It’s going to require more than
putting the key in the ignition, it’s going to take a jump-start, which requires
four essential components: supportive and committed leadership, an understanding
of what a diversity issue is, a challenge of the status quo, and a firm-wide
assessment.
Supportive
and Committed Firm Leadership
It is not enough to have
leadership that is merely supportive. If firm leadership is not committed to
addressing internal and external diversity issues in the short, medium, and long
term, the program will not succeed. Supportive firm leadership “signs the check”
so to speak. They are there in body but not in mind and spirit. Committed firm
leadership is accessible and out in front and wants to hold people accountable.
Those committed want to see results and are asking the difficult questions and
demanding answers. Committed firm leaders are completely in touch with the
increasingly diverse new marketplace landscape.
Firm leadership must understand
that acknowledging and addressing diversity issues will take an unyielding
effort and an unwavering commitment to long-term change. Leadership must admit
the firm needs to change certain policies, procedures, and business practices --
both those that are formal and, more importantly, those that are informal
(written and unwritten rules of the firm).
The typical first reaction of
many organizations is denial. They are in denial that they have issues and that
there are any intentional or formal causes for the diversity issues they face as
an organization. Law firms have to move beyond the root causes if they feel they
cannot do anything about the contributing factors. Don’t get fixed on the root
causes, focus instead on actions and solutions to address these issues. Denying
the issues exist will not make them go away. Quite the opposite, the diversity
issues typically fester when not addressed and can grow out-of-control and
unfettered will garner increasing client scrutiny. For any law firm, diversity
issues are an opportunity when addressed and a mounting problem when ignored.
Understanding and addressing diversity issues is not a short-term process.
Committed support requires consensus among the partners and, in particular,
among firm leadership as to what, how, why, and when internal and external
diversity issues will be addressed. This process demands time and hard work.
Without it, the jump-start will falter.
Understanding What is a
Diversity Issue is Crucial
If you don’t know what a diversity issue is how
will you know when you have come across one? What is the criterion that any
matter must meet to be defined as a diversity issue?
A firm has a diversity issue (opportunity or
problem) when:
 |
A policy or business practice (formal,
informal, internal, or external) has a different impact on a
particular group (for example, do billable hour requirements
disproportionately penalize certain associates?); |
 |
The firm practice
happens more frequently to a
particular group (for example, who gets to go to pitches – who makes them, who
is present to observe and who is not, or who gets real feedback on their
briefs and who does not); or |
 |
The potential barrier
is more difficult for one group
to overcome (upward mobility for a particular group within a firm,
including who is represented in leadership positions and who is not – “glass
or color ceilings”). |
A diversity
issue exists when the firm policy or business practice affects attorneys of
different backgrounds differently. In other words, certain firm practices
produce outcomes that affect the majority differently from the up and coming
minorities in the attorney ranks. If the practice is inclusive – everyone
benefits. If the practice is exclusive of difference, certain underrepresented
attorneys might suffer adversely. Is there a trend or pattern that impacts
certain groups of attorneys and staff differently? For example, look at the top
10 rainmakers in your firm. Who are these rainmakers mentoring? Is the next
generation of “mega-billers” different from the current “in group or dominant
group” in the firm? Does your firm have diverse bench strength? Do your clients
see your firm as a diverse firm promulgating diversity of thought, background,
and legal problem-solving innovation or “more of the same?”
Having a diversity issue is not necessarily a
bad thing. Doing nothing about it is where firms go wrong. Denial does not make
these issues go away, and will not keep clients from scrutinizing business
practices. When you have identified your diversity issues you come to a fork in
the road. You can thus address them or deny they exist and not take action.
Question why
the firm has the diversity issue, and what actions would correct and improve the
situation. This process requires challenging the status quo.
Challenging the
Status Quo
Acknowledging the firm might
have diversity issues is the first step to challenging the status quo. Adhering
to the status quo -- doing the same things the firm has always done -- yet
expecting better results is organizational suicide.
Challenge the status quo by
studying or assessing where the diversity issues lie within the firm and how to
address them. Be prepared to question firm policies and procedures, especially
those that have a disproportionate impact on minorities and women. Keep nothing
sacred because this practice prepares firm leadership for the diversity needs
assessment.
Conducting a
Firm-wide Assessment
A
diversity needs assessment or audit will establish a baseline and define the
firm’s current status on all diversity-related firm matters. The assessment
gathers data in many ways: a firm-wide survey, individual interviews with
partners and associates, and focus groups consisting of both homogeneous and
heterogeneous participant groups. Here, it is important to ask the same
questions of different audiences and compare the results, which is called
validating the data.
What
are we hearing in the interviews and focus groups and does this data jive with
the interview results. Are there patterns? It’s key to reach out to people in
the dominant or in-group and compare their answers to the same questions posed
to individuals in the out-groups. In other words, what are the new associates
saying versus partners in response to a particular question and compare what the
men said versus the women, or what the majority said in comparison to what the
new emerging minorities are saying. Do all of the partners identify similar
emerging diversity issues or is there disagreement. If so, why?
There
are issues you know you have, issues you suspect you have, and issues you have
no clue you have as a firm. Until you conduct some kind of audit or assessment
of the firm – you don’t have your bearings.
Additionally, always listen to the feedback. Are the focus groups agreeing with
comments in the one-to-one interviews? Comparing the interviews, focus group,
and survey data will reveal what is consistent across the firm and what might be
unique to a particular office or region. The bigger the firm the higher the
probability that there are local, regional, and national diversity issues which
begs a diversity strategy and plan that has local, regional, and national action
items.
Once
all of the feedback is gathered look for themes, trends, and recurring diversity
issues. These data points will form the backbone of the design and development
of the firm’s diversity strategy and plan, and give the firm a baseline from
which to measure future success
Critical Success
Factors
What
does it take to ensure the long-term success of a diversity program? The
critical success factors include developing and communicating a diversity
strategy and plan, and executing it for long-term change.
Developing a
Diversity Strategy and Plan
A diversity strategy outlines
all of the areas within and outside of the firm that impact the firm’s
diversity. These areas typically include:
 | Firm
image in local, regional, and national markets; |
 | Sourcing
and recruiting of attorneys (first years and laterals); |
 | Screening
and selection of attorneys; |
 | Development of all attorneys (not just minorities or women); |
 | Upward
mobility of all attorneys; |
 | Developing and nurturing an inclusive workplace culture; |
 | Minority
or diversity supplier procurement program; and |
 | Marketing
of diversity efforts internally and externally. |
The accompanying plan is the
detail behind the strategy, which includes all of the initiatives, activities,
policies, procedures, and actions that the firm is purposely and formally
executing to undergo the transformation to a more diverse and inclusive law
firm.
Never seen a firm-wide
diversity strategy and plan? Diversity consultants are often hired to present
sample strategies and plans – a menu of potential action items – so to speak.
The leading firms are out in front attempting to differentiate themselves from
traditional firms with their diversity endeavors. Be ready for the day a client
shares the plan of another firm as the high-water mark. Remember, studying what
other firms are doing only tells you how they are addressing their unique
diversity issues. Your issues may differ, however, you might like the way some
of your competition addressed similar issues.
Communicating Firm
Strategy and Plan
Once there is a diversity
strategy and plan in place, it should be communicated both internally and
externally. Develop a brochure to use both for new hires as well as for existing
and prospective clients. Refer readers to the firm’s web site. Produce a video
-- a “fireside chat” with your managing partner -- that can run on the website
and be distributed to new hires. While the plan itself will be more detailed,
these products show that the firm has a strong diversity strategy in place.
It is imperative that firms
promote their diversity initiatives. The competition is already there.
Associations provide a forum for firms who have had diversity successes, thus
clients and prospective employees who are committed to diversity look to such
organizations first.
Executing For
Long-term Change
A firm’s diversity
strategy and plan should include clear goals and benchmarks. Without them, the
firm has no way of measuring its progress. Progress should also be measured
through the business case -- a detailed look at the impact that diversity
programs have on the bottom line. These benefits include lowering turnover (and
decreasing training costs), attracting new business, achieving higher billable
hours, and even lowering health costs, because happier employees are less
stressed. Publicize these accomplishments. Make sure the firm keeps its eye on
the prize.
A diversity strategy and plan
is about creating a better firm for all attorneys and staff, not just minorities
and women. The diversity journey is a long one, with a destination that may at
times seem elusive. But the rewards are well worth it: a productive, passionate
staff; a strong, growing bottom line; and recognition and admiration by clients
and competitors. Jump-starting a diversity program ensures that a law firm’s
goals do not stall out in neutral.

Return to Top |