|







| |
Diversity & The Bar
Jump-Starting Your Law Firm's Diversity Program
By Mauricio Velásquez
At a recent firm retreat it is evident to everyone that there is a real
conspicuous absence of visible diversity among your partners. There seems to be
consensus of a shared concern among the partners, but no one comes forward to
take the bull by the horns. This could be called a moment of truth or an
"internal driver" or motivator. Your company could also be dealing with the
marketplace realities where some of your clients are beginning to point out that
they don't see representative talent from all walks of life in your firm's
attorney ranks, and it is beginning to concern them and their stakeholders. This
is what I could call an "external driver."
For years, you, your colleagues, and your firm leadership has noticed this
developing reality, but the firm hasn't seemed able to "move the diversity
needle." What are you lacking? A formal diversity strategy and plan, the
backbone of any diversity program, is typically the first place a diversity
consultant looks upon consulting with law firms regarding their emerging
internal and external diversity issues.
The success of a diversity program is measured through several factors, such as
the nurturing of an inclusive workplace culture, growth in the hiring,
retention, and promotion of women and minorities, and the increase in business
with clients that explicitly value and reward diversity.
But sometimes growth can stagnate, momentum can stall, and programs that were
once received with great enthusiasm disappear. What's the solution? It's going
to require more than putting the key in the ignition. It's going to take a
jump-start, which requires four essential components: supportive and committed
leadership, an understanding of what a diversity issue is, a challenge of the
status quo, and a firm-wide assessment.
It is not enough to have leadership that is merely supportive. If firm
leadership is not committed to addressing internal and external diversity issues
in the short, medium, and long term, the program will not succeed. Unsupportive
firm leadership "signs the check" so to speak. They are there in body but not in
mind and spirit. Committed firm leadership is accessible, out in front, and
wants to hold people accountable. Those committed want to see results and are
asking the difficult questions and demanding answers. Committed firm leaders are
completely in touch with the increasingly diverse new marketplace landscape.
Firm leadership must understand that acknowledging and addressing diversity
issues will take an unyielding effort and an unwavering commitment to long-term
change. Leadership must admit the firm needs to change certain policies,
procedures, and business practices-both those that are formal and, more
importantly, those that are informal (written and unwritten rules of the firm).
The typical first reaction of many organizations is denial. They are in denial
that they have issues and that there are any intentional or formal causes for
the diversity issues they face as an organization. Law firms have to move beyond
the root causes if they feel they cannot do anything about the contributing
factors. Don't get fixed on the root causes; focus instead on actions and
solutions to address these issues. Denying the issues exist will not make them
go away. Quite the opposite; the diversity issues typically fester when not
addressed and can grow out-of-control and unfettered, which will garner
increasing client scrutiny. For any law firm, diversity issues are an
opportunity when addressed and a mounting problem when ignored.
Understanding and addressing diversity issues is not a short-term process.
Committed support requires consensus among the partners and, in particular,
among firm leadership as to what, how, why, and when internal and external
diversity issues will be addressed. This process demands time and hard work.
Without it, the jump-start will falter.
If you don't know what a diversity issue is, how will you know when you have
come across one? What is the criterion that a situation must meet to be defined
as a diversity issue?
A firm has a diversity issue (opportunity or problem) when:
 |
A policy or business practice (formal, informal,
internal, or external) has a different impact on a particular group
(for example, do billable hour requirements disproportionately penalize
certain associates?); |
 |
The firm practice happens more frequently
to a particular group (for example, who gets to go to pitches-who makes them,
who is present to observe and who is not, or who gets real feedback on their
briefs and who does not); or |
 |
The potential barrier is more difficult for
one group to overcome (upward mobility for a particular group within a
firm, including who is represented in leadership positions and who is
not-"glass or color ceilings"). |
A diversity issue exists when the firm policy or business practice affects
attorneys of different backgrounds unequally. In other words, certain firm
practices produce outcomes that affect the majority differently from the
up-and-coming minorities in the attorney ranks. If the practice is inclusive,
everyone benefits. If the practice is exclusive of difference, certain
underrepresented attorneys might suffer adversely. Is there a trend or pattern
that impacts certain groups of attorneys and staff disproportionally? For
example, look at the top 10 rainmakers in your firm. Who are these leaders
mentoring? Is the next generation of "mega-billers" different from the current
"in group or dominant group" in the firm? Does your firm have diverse bench
strength? Do your clients see your firm as an inclusive firm promulgating
diversity of thought, background, and legal problem-solving innovation, or "more
of the same?"
Having a diversity issue is not necessarily a bad thing. Doing nothing about it
is where firms go wrong. Denial does not make these issues go away, and will not
keep clients from scrutinizing business practices. When you have identified your
diversity issues, you come to a fork in the road. You can thus address them or
deny they exist and not take action.
Question why the firm has the diversity issue, and what actions would correct
and improve the situation. This process requires challenging the status quo.
|
Eight Major Myths About Diversity |
By Mauricio
Velásquez |
|
Leaders committed to diversity are sometimes confronted with
myths that challenge programs' worthiness and effectiveness. To ensure
long-term, firm-wide change, these myths must be debunked with passion and
purpose.
Myth 1: Diversity is a problem. No, it is an opportunity. You can't
understand and take advantage of something "you don't know you don't
know." Your diversity strategy and plan is an opportunity to differentiate
your firm from the competition-don't blow it.
Myth 2: Diversity is our human resource department's responsibility.
No, it is your responsibility. Too many people say, "That's not my
problem; our personnel people have to handle the diversity issues." Wrong.
Everyone (partners, associates, administration, staff) plays a significant
role.
Myth 3: Diversity is just about race and gender. No, it is much
broader than that. It used to be called cultural diversity, but the
conversation has become more inclusive.
Myth 4: Diversity is about minorities and women in the workplace.
No, diversity is about your internal (employees) and external (prospects
and clients) customers. Understanding the diversity in your employee and
customer ranks and anticipating needs can make or break your firm (most
likely break if you subscribe to this myth). Diversity marketing-targeting
new, increasingly diverse "emerging markets" is a hot new field. |
Myth 5: Diversity is about exclusivity.
No, it is
about inclusivity. In other words, diversity is about all of us. If you
feel diversity is about attacking the white male, you are mistaken.
Diversity is not about getting "them" into your corporate culture
(assimilation). Diversity is about creating a culture where everyone can
thrive and contribute to your firm, and understand and serve your
increasingly diverse clients.
Myth 6: Diversity is about lowering standards. Be very careful with
this notion. Many people take great offense to this perception. Firms that
are committed to diversity are not lowering standards, but are widening
the pool-and sometimes raising standards or rewriting them.
Myth 7: Diversity is just another fad. Look at your workforce and
client marketplace today and compare it with five and ten years ago. Then
try to look five and ten years into the future. Do the same analysis for
your customer base. Look at the demographic projections for the future.
You'll see that diversity is not a fad, but a preview.
Myth 8: Diversity is another version of Equal Employment
Opportunity/Affirmative Action. No, it is very different from EEO/AA.
Diversity concerns all employees and customers. Minorities and women are
the context for EEO/AA. |
Acknowledging the firm might have diversity issues is the first step to
challenging the status quo. Adhering to the status quo-doing the same things the
firm has always done, yet expecting better results-is organizational suicide.
Challenge the status quo by studying or assessing where the diversity issues lie
within the firm and how to address them. Be prepared to question firm policies
and procedures, especially those that have a disproportionate impact on
minorities and women. Keep nothing sacred because this practice prepares firm
leadership for the diversity needs assessment.
A diversity needs assessment or audit will establish a baseline and define the
firm's current status on all diversity-related firm matters. The assessment
gathers data in many ways: a firm-wide survey, individual interviews with
partners and associates, and focus groups consisting of both homogeneous and
heterogeneous participant groups. Here, it is important to ask the same
questions of different audiences and compare the results, which is called
validating the data.
What are we hearing in the interviews and focus groups and does this data jive
with the interview results? Are there patterns? It's key to reach out to people
in the dominant or in-group and compare their answers to the same questions
posed to individuals in the out-groups. In other words, what are the new
associates saying versus partners in response to a particular question? Compare
what the men said versus the women, or what the majority said in comparison to
what the new emerging minorities are saying. Do all of the partners identify
similar emerging diversity issues, or is there disagreement? If so, why?
There are issues you know you have, issues you suspect you have, and issues you
have no clue you have as a firm. Until you conduct some kind of audit or
assessment of the firm, you don't have your bearings.
Additionally, always listen to the feedback. Are the focus groups agreeing with
comments in the one-to-one interviews? Comparing the interviews, focus group,
and survey data will reveal what is consistent across the firm and what might be
unique to a particular office or region. The bigger the firm, the higher the
probability that there are local, regional, and national diversity issues that
beg a diversity strategy and plan that has local, regional, and national action
items.
Once all of the feedback is gathered, look for themes, trends, and recurring
diversity issues. These data points will form the backbone of the design and
development of the firm's diversity strategy and plan, and give the firm a
baseline from which to measure future success.
What does it take to ensure the long-term success of a diversity program? The
critical success factors include developing and communicating a diversity
strategy and plan, and executing it for long-term change.
A diversity strategy outlines all of the areas within and outside of the firm
that impact the firm's diversity. These areas typically include:
 |
Firm image in local, regional, and national
markets; |
 |
Sourcing and recruiting of attorneys (first
years and laterals); |
 |
Screening and selection of attorneys;
|
 |
Development of all attorneys (not just
minorities or women); |
 |
Upward mobility of all attorneys; |
 |
Developing and nurturing an inclusive workplace
culture; |
 |
Minority or diversity supplier procurement
program; and |
 |
Marketing of diversity efforts internally and
externally. |
The accompanying plan is the detail behind the strategy, which includes all
of the initiatives, activities, policies, procedures, and actions that the firm
is purposely and formally executing to undergo the transformation to a more
diverse and inclusive law firm.
Never seen a firm-wide diversity strategy and plan? Diversity consultants are
often hired to present sample strategies and plans-a menu of potential action
items, so to speak. The leading firms are out in front attempting to
differentiate themselves from traditional firms with their diversity endeavors.
Be ready for the day a client shares the plan of another firm as the high-water
mark. Remember, studying what other firms are doing only tells you how they are
addressing their unique diversity issues. Your issues may differ; however, you
might like the way some of your competitors addressed similar issues.
Once there is a diversity strategy and plan in place, it should be communicated
both internally and externally. Develop a brochure to use both for new hires as
well as for existing and prospective clients. Refer readers to the firm's web
site. Produce a video-a "fireside chat" with your managing partner-that can run
on the web site and be distributed to new hires. While the plan itself will be
more detailed, these products show that the firm has a strong diversity strategy
in place.
It is imperative that firms promote their diversity initiatives. The competition
is already there. Associations provide a forum for firms that have had diversity
successes, thus clients and prospective employees who are committed to diversity
look to such organizations first.
A firm's diversity strategy and plan should include clear goals and benchmarks.
Without them, the firm has no way of measuring its progress. Progress should
also be measured through the business case-a detailed look at the impact that
diversity programs have on the bottom line. These benefits include lowering
turnover (and decreasing training costs), attracting new business, achieving
higher billable hours, and even lowering health costs, because happier employees
are less stressed. Publicize these accomplishments. Make sure the firm keeps its
eye on the prize.
A diversity strategy and plan is about creating a better firm for all attorneys
and staff, not just minorities and women. The diversity journey is a long one,
with a destination that may at times seem elusive. But the rewards are well
worth it: a productive, passionate staff; a strong, growing bottom line; and
recognition and admiration by clients and competitors. Jump-starting a diversity
program ensures that a law firm's goals do not stall out in neutral.
Mauricio Velásquez is the president and CEO of The Diversity Training Group,
Inc., located in Herndon, Va. For more information, go to
www.diversitydtg.com.
From the
July/August 2005 issue of Diversity & The Bar®

Other Articles
 |